| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2004 |
|
|
|
News Bites from
the Wacky World of Big Food |
|
|
|
Mad Dash to Spin Mad Cow |
|
By now we’ve all heard the inevitable news of the first case
of mad cow disease identified in the United States. Also
predictable has been the government and industry reassurances
to Americans to go back to their blissful enjoyment of Big
Macs and milk shakes. (Never mind all those other countries
banning our imports.)
While many beef and fast food companies are relying on the
trusty USDA to calm fears, others are taking their
own actions to desperately spin its way out of this
potentially damaging news. For example, ad execs at Burger
King are going ahead with a new Whopper television campaign
but will retool the ads to include the chicken Whopper. The
National Cattleman's Beef Association is getting a little more
aggressive, holding press briefings almost daily, starting a
Web site, but not being too deterred: Look for yet another
"Beef, It's What's for Dinner" television campaign later this
month.
According to PR Week, meat industry trade groups were
“scurrying” during the holiday season “to coordinate key
messages” to answer the barrage of media calls. The American
Meat Institute's top spokeswoman, Janet Riley, even allowed
NBC News into her kitchen on Christmas day to tape "her
preparing beef for dinner in an effort to demonstrate her
faith in the safety of the beef supply.”
Similarly, USDA Secretary Ann Veneman told Americans not to
change any plans for their holiday meal, as she planned to
serve beef at hers. (How touching.) But can we really believe
an agency whose top staffers come from the meat and dairy
industries? For example, Veneman's chief of staff Dale Moore,
press secretary Alisa Harrison, deputy under secretary for
marketing and regulatory programs Chuck Lambert, and senior
advisor for food and nutrition Elizabeth Johnson all
previously worked for the National Cattlemen's Beef
Association.
And just for further proof that the USDA is in the pockets of
industry, the agency continues its almost daily practice of
bailing out Big Agribusiness by buying up overproduced beef
products. In their latest report, the USDA “purchased
5,418,000 pounds of frozen ground beef at a cost of
approximately $7,250,000. These products are for use in
federal food and nutrition programs.”
Sources:
New York Times, 01/01/04
PR Week, 01/05/04
http://www.prweek.com/news/news_story.cfm?ID=198740&site=3
PCRM press release, 01/05/04
http://www.pcrm.org/news/health040106.html
USDA Food Purchase
Report, 01/07/04
http://www.ams.usda.gov/lsg/cp/beef/2i29fpr.txt |
|
|
We Send Potatoes, They Make Chips |
Last month, Washington state Governor Gary Locke announced
that five million pounds of fresh potatoes would be shipped to
South Korea in a $375,000 deal. The potatoes are apparently
destined to be processed into chips—lots of them. The
first-ever shipments of fresh Washington potatoes to South
Korean potato chip manufacturers was hailed as a “major
breakthrough for Washington farmers” and “truly
a cause for
celebration."“We have
succeeded in opening the Korean market for Washington state
chipping potatoes,” Locke said. Pat Boss, executive director
of the Washington State Potato Commission explained: “For the
past couple of years, the Potato Commission had envisioned
that there would be a demand for chip potatoes in countries
like Korea, Taiwan, and Japan.” As a result of our continued
efforts to educate Korean snack food manufacturers about the
quality of our chip potatoes, we are seeing some good things
happen.” Not so good for the consumers in these Asian
countries whose obesity rates are sure to rise along with
their increasing adoption of American-style junk food eating
habits.
Sources:
Tribnet.com, 12/11/03
http://www.tribnet.com/business/v-printer/story/4506577p-4484383c.html
Washington
Governor’s Office Press Release, 12/10/03
http://www.governor.wa.gov/press/press-view.asp?pressRelease=1486&newsType=1
|
|
Let ‘em Take Drugs |
|
Last month, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the
use of the obesity drug, Xenical, for adolescents, marking the
first time that a weight-loss drug has been permitted to treat
overweight children. With 15 percent of American children
overweight, Terence Hurley, a spokesman for the drug’s
manufacturer, Hoffman-La Roche, called the move good news for
teens who battle obesity. "We're thrilled with the approval,"
he said.
Xenical works by blocking the
body's ability to digest fat and works best when combined with
a low-calorie diet that limits high-fat foods. Instead of
being digested, one-third of the fat a person eats will
accumulate in the intestines and be excreted. Children taking
the drug are advised to avoid some common teenager foods like
pizza and french fries. Cheaters can suffer an array of side
effects like bloating, flatulence, oily stool, diarrhea and
fecal incontinence. By blocking fat absorption, the drug also
blocks absorption of the fat-soluble vitamins
as well as beta-carotene, so people have to take daily vitamin
supplements—more pills to counteract the effects of the other
pills. How about instead our government put some money into
educating teens about eating healthier and exercising more?
Source: New
York Times, 12/16/03
|
|
Fighting Back: Legal Strategies
and Other Good News |
| |
|
Legislators and Litigators Take on
Obesity
An excellent cover story in the
Los Angeles Times on January 3 spelled out a number of legal
strategies, from the “statehouse to the courthouse” to help
stem the rising tide of obesity. The article highlighted
efforts of California state Senator Deborah Ortiz who led a
legislative victory that will restrict soft drink sales in the
state's elementary and middle schools starting this year. In
addition, school boards across the country are ordering the
removal of snack foods high in sugar and fat from vending
machines, revamping the nutritional content of school lunches,
and reinvigorating physical education programs.
Also, New
York legislators are considering a bill to require chain
restaurants to display nutrition facts. Lawmakers in Maine are
considering a similar measure, along with a bill that would
allow health insurance companies to offer 20 percent discounts
to people within their ideal weight range. And across the
country, almost a dozen states have recently repealed
exemptions from state sales taxes on candy, baked goods, and
soft drinks.
The article
also featured George
Washington
University law professor and anti-tobacco crusader John
Banzhaf who has spearheaded a courtroom strategy against the
food industry. He points to litigation as a way to raise
public awareness and create a groundswell for lawmakers and regulators
to mandate change. Thus far, Banzhaf concedes that courtroom
victories have been modest. Nevertheless, he is encouraged by
modest changes in corporate practices. "These companies are
saying, look, this litigation has potential," says Banzhaf.
"Fat could be the next tobacco, and it's enough of a threat to
do something about."
Source: Los
Angeles Times, 01/03/04
http://www.latimes.com/la-he-fatfight3jan03,1,4306706.story
|
|
Sodas Out of Canada Schools While AAP
Speaks Out |
|
In response to concerns about obesity in children, the
Canadian soft drink industry will pull all of its carbonated
beverages from elementary and junior high schools in the
country by the beginning of the next school year. A
spokeswoman for Refreshments Canada, a lobby group for
companies such as Coke and Pepsi, said it believes its
products are appropriate for school children but has heard the
message from Canadian parents. Still, some are calling
for the industry to extend the ban to high schools, suggesting
that the action was really a preemptive strategy designed to
protect that more profitable venue, knowing that any school
board action would likely include high schools.
Meanwhile in this country, the big related news is the policy
statement released on January 5 from the American Academy of
Pediatrics. The policy recommends that school districts
consider restricting the sale of soft drinks and that
pediatricians work to eliminate sweetened soft drinks in
schools.
While much was made in the press over this announcement, a
closer look reveals many of the recommendations as fairly
obvious and not going far enough. For example, the statement
recommends that if a school district already has a soft drink
contract in place, “it should be adapted so that it does not
promote over-consumption by students.” What does that mean?
Why not work to rescind the contract all together? The policy
also recommends that “soft drinks not be sold as part of, or
in competition with, the school lunch program,” a rule that is
already part of the USDA’s national school lunch guidelines,
so no controversy there. While we applaud any major medical
establishment group speaking out on this important issue, a
stronger recommendation would have been to simply ban soda
sales in schools, period.
Sources:
Montreal Gazette, 01/07/04
http://www.canada.com/montreal/montrealgazette/editorials/story.asp?id=2E6F37CB-7923-4D3D-96C4-015932510969
American Academy of Pediatrics Press Release, 01/05/04
http://www.aap.org/advocacy/releases/jansoftdrinks.htm
|
|
MEDIA WATCH: ABC News Special on Food
Politics |
It’s easy to
point to the media being part of the problem when it comes to
lame reporting on the obesity crisis. But a big exception to
that rule aired on ABC on December 8, 2003 with "Peter
Jennings Reporting: How To Get Fat Without Really Trying." This
hard-hitting one-hour program was unique for its examination
of the connections between U.S. agricultural policies (such as
excessive corn subsidies), ubiquitous processed foods, and
obesity rates, along with a critique of aggressive
marketing
of junk food to children and suggested policy reforms.
Well-known
nutrition advocates Marion Nestle and Michael Jacobson spoke
eloquently about how industry and government bore their share
of the responsibility for Americans’ overeating, and while
Jennings did give requisite air time to industry spokespeople,
they came off sounding transparent and cold. But most pathetic
was Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson, who
readily admitted that agricultural subsidies are based on
political decisions that are unlikely to change. For the top
public health official in the country, he didn’t really seem
all that concerned about any connection to the obesity
epidemic.
Big kudos
to ABC and Peter Jennings for telling the American people the
truth. Let’s hope this sets a new trend in honest journalism.
And no more diet stories!
To
purchase a video tape or DVD of the program:
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/WNT/Living/obesity_031208-1.html
|
|
|
 |
|
The Center for
Informed Food Choices in a nonprofit organization that
advocates for a whole foods, plant-based diet and educates
about the politics of food.
CIFC is proud to make Informed Eating available as a
free public service. Unlike industry publications, it is not
underwritten by corporate sponsors. We would greatly
appreciate your support for this newsletter and our other
important policy work.
For more
information or to make a tax-deductible donation, please visit
www.informedeating.org or call (510) 465-0322.
Thank
you for your support! |
| |
|
We encourage you to pass
this newsletter along to friends.
2004
Informed Eating - All Rights Reserved |
|
|
|
|