| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2004 |
|
|
|
News Bites from
the Wacky World of Big Food |
|
|
|
Operation Fast Food Invasion |
|
Several stories struck us this month as fitting the theme of
the “McDonaldization” of the world. It’s no secret that
American fast food companies, having saturated markets here,
are spreading to foreign lands. Now, KFC, already with 1,000
outlets in China is setting its sights on Tibet. This year,
parent company, Yum Brands (which also owns Taco Bell and
Pizza Hut) plans to open hundreds of KFC outlets in Tibet and
to expand Taco Bell franchises in China. According to Yum
representative, Samuel Su, "Our experience has shown that when
we get into cities, the people are so excited that KFC has
finally arrived that we attract very large crowds.”
Not be outdone, McDonald's—with just 570 restaurants in
China—plans to open nearly 100 new outlets around the country
this year and promote “McKIDS” products, including clothing,
toys, video games, and books. The battle to win over Chinese
tastes is on, with KFC introducing a Beijing-style chicken
wrap last year, complete with spring onions and hoisen sauce.
But Tim Lai, with McDonald's China Development Company, is not
impressed: "Consumers do not go to McDonald's for
Chinese-style food. Furthermore, McDonald's pays great efforts
to conduct public welfare activities.” (Not sure what that
means, but that’s what he said.)
Finally, Krispy Kreme Doughnuts opened its first store in
Mexico last month, in Interlomas, a suburb of Mexico City. The
company plans to open 20 stores around the country over the
next six years. "Krispy Kreme's expansion into Mexico is an
exciting and long-awaited event," said Scott Livengood,
company chairman. "We've been honored by a tremendous
reception in Mexico City, and we look forward to building new
relationships with customers throughout the country." The
store will include Krispy Kreme's doughnut-making theatre,
allowing customers to see the doughnuts being made from start
to finish.
It
would be great if customers could also see the artery clogging
process from start to finish. Too bad these developing
countries don’t have the advanced medical technologies to
handle the inevitable resulting chronic health problems. (See
related story below.)
Sources: China Daily, 01/15/04
http://www1.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2004-01/15/content_299176.htm
http://www1.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2004-01/15/content_299083.htm
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. Press Release, 01/20/04
http://ir.thomsonfn.com/InvestorRelations/PubNewsStory.aspx?partner=6012&storyId=101674 |
|
|
Politics of Global Obesity |
As
the leader of the free world, the United States also holds the
dubious distinction of being the world leader in obesity.
However, the rest of the world is fast catching up. The
International Obesity Task Force estimates that one billion
people are overweight or obese, including many living in
developing countries. Trying to tackle this global public
heath crisis, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recent
report, “Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and
Health, " encourages governments to adopt a number of basic
steps, including better food labeling, limits on junk food
advertising, the promotion of more fruits and vegetables, and
eating less sugar; nothing too radical here.
Enter the
Bush Administration, claiming that the WHO recommendations
aren’t based on science, and calling for personal
responsibility to solve the obesity epidemic. Sound familiar?
That’s the food industry’s familiar refrain. As so eloquently
stated by Kelly Brownell and Marion Nestle in their excellent
New York Times op-ed piece: “When food industry executives or
government officials complain about the lack of sound science,
self-interest is generally at work…. By making its position on
the WHO indistinguishable from that of the food industry, the
Bush administration undermines the efforts of more
forward-thinking food companies and threatens public health.
Its action underscores the need for government to create a
wall between itself and the food industry when establishing
nutrition and public health policy.”
A
fortress might be more like it, especially given Corporate
America’s role in proliferating global obesity by exporting
Big Macs, Coke, and Krispy Kreme.
Sources:
New York Times, 01/23/04
Commercial Alert, Alternet, 01/26/04
http://www.alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=17649
|
|
As Obesity Rates Soar, So Do Costs |
|
The United States spent $75 billion last year on medical
expenses related to obesity, with California paying the most
at $7.7 billion, according to a study published this month in
the journal Obesity Research. Taxpayers paid half the bill
through the government's Medicare and Medicaid health
programs. The findings indicated obesity-related health
problems accounted for 5.7 percent of the nation's total
medical expenses. Researchers from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention and RTI International concluded that
“policy makers should consider these estimates,
along with other factors, in determining how best
to allocate scarce public health resources.”
Sources:
http://www.obesityresearch.org/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/18
http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/r040121.htm
|
|
Chutzpah Award: Frito-Lay Food Guide
Pyramid |
|
As our
federal government is hard at work re-drawing the useless Food
Guide Pyramid, the good folks at Frito-Lay have crafted their
own entry. No folks, this is NOT a parody, it’s the real deal.
But someone at Salty Snack Central must have lost a little
sleep, because the image was only up on the company’s Web site
for a short time. Still, you can read plenty of comedic
corporate spin here
http://www.fritolay.com/nutrition/transfatfree.shtml,
where Frito-Lay proudly lists no fewer than 158 of its
“trans fat free” products, including the likes of “LAY’S
Chicago Steakhouse Loaded Baked Potato Flavored Potato Chips”
and “SMARTFOOD Reduced Fat White Cheddar Cheese Flavored
Popcorn.” Well, thank god they’re trans fat free!

|
|
Fighting Back: Legal Strategies
and Other Good News |
| |
|
Banning Junk Food in Schools
Washington State is becoming the latest battleground over
school vending machines. The legislature there is considering
a bill that would restrict junk food in school vending
machines, or at least offer healthier foods alongside sugary
sodas and candy bars. The bill proposes that a model nutrition
policy be developed as a guideline for individual school
districts. Last year, State Rep. Eileen Cody, a registered
nurse and co-sponsor of the bill, encountered resistance from
vending-machine and soft-drink lobbyists, and the bill died in
committee. We wish her better luck this time around.
Meanwhile, a ban on sugary sodas in Philadelphia schools takes
effect this June and San Francisco schools have completed
phasing in a bold new plan that may be the nation’s most
comprehensive healthy-food policy: a “no empty calories”
standard for all foods sold to students during school,
kindergarten through 12th grade.
Sources: Seattle Times, 01/26/04
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2001843779_junkfood26m.html
Parents Advocating School Accountability Press Release,
02/04/04
|
|
Foreign Resistance to the Real
Thing |
|
While KFC and McDonald’s
duke it out over Chinese customers, Coca-Cola is facing an
unlikely enemy in India: the customers themselves. Last month,
more than 500 protesters marched and rallied to condemn
the soft drink giant's operations there. The protesters, including 150
residents who live in and around Coca-Cola’s bottling
facilities, were joined by a large group of international
supporters at the World Social Forum in Mumbai. Complaints
from three Indian communities include severe water shortages
as a result of Coca-Cola’s mining of groundwater resources and
the company’s indiscriminate dumping of wastewater, resulting
in the pollution of what little water is left over.
Tests of Coca-Cola products in the Indian market in September
2003 confirmed the presence of pesticides in the soft drinks,
sometimes 30 times higher than those allowed by the European
Union standards. The government of India has initiated an
inquiry into the findings and has banned the sale of Coca-Cola
and Pepsico products in cafeterias. The international campaign
to hold Coca-Cola accountable is planning a series of events
in the U.S. to force the company to clean up its act. Maybe
they can join forces with American schools.
Source: McLibel Support Campaign Press Release, 01/19/04
http://www.mcspotlight.org/media/press/releases/msc190104.html
|
|
Take Away the Ads, Keep the Coke |
|
First the good news: Coca-Cola plans to remove
advertising for soft drinks from the front of all its 4,000
vending machines in secondary schools across Britain. The bad
news? The 4,000 vending machines. Coca-Cola said the
announcement means, for example, that large pictures of a can
of Coke or Fanta will be replaced with panels showing children
playing in a cartoon scene without any branding. Without
blinking an eye, Ian Deste, the head of corporate affairs at
Coca-Cola Enterprises said: "We share the view that classrooms
should be a commercial-free area and clearly there is some
conflict then with highly-visible, highly-branded machines.”
However, he rejected talk of vending machines being banned
from schools altogether.
Of
course he did; wouldn’t want to get too radical. Anyway, who
needs the ads when they’ve already got the soda? Interesting
that this story ran with the original headline, “Coca-Cola to
end adverts in schools.” If this is all you read, it’s pretty
misleading.
Source: Scotsman.com, 01/26/04
http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=95072004
|
|
Editorials |
|
Real Reasons to be Mad about Beef
This article, written by Michele
Simon and Richard Ganis, was released over the Ascribe
newswire on January 22, 2004 and is available on the CIFC Web
site at:
http://www.informedeating.org/docs/TheRealResonstobeMadaboutBeefWeb.htm.
Low Carb Means High
Profits for Food Giants
This article, written by Michele
Simon, was published in the San Francisco Chronicle on January
23, 2004 and is available on the CIFC Web site at: http://www.informedeating.org/docs/LowCarbopedasinChronicle.htm.
|
 |
|
The Center for
Informed Food Choices in a nonprofit organization that
advocates for a whole foods, plant-based diet and educates
about the politics of food.
CIFC is proud to make Informed Eating available as a
free public service. Unlike industry publications, it is not
underwritten by corporate sponsors. We would greatly
appreciate your support for this newsletter and our other
important policy work.
For more
information or to make a tax-deductible donation, please visit
www.informedeating.org or call (510) 465-0322.
Thank
you for your support! |
| |
|
We encourage you to pass
this newsletter along to friends.
2004
Informed Eating - All Rights Reserved |
|
|
|
|