| |
|
|
|
|
|
August 2005 |
|
Editor's Note:
With this issue, Informed Eating
comes out of its summer hiatus because we just had too much
to say about recent events to keep quiet any longer. Hope
you enjoy the special report on the federal government’s
workshop on marketing and childhood obesity more than I
enjoyed attending the sorry event. Stay tuned in September
for a special back-to-school report on state legislation. |
|
Special Report on Food
Marketing to Children |
|
Last month,
the federal government convened a meeting called “Marketing,
Self-Regulation, and Childhood Obesity.” That the emphasis
was placed on voluntary self-regulation—as opposed to
setting legal restrictions on junk food marketing aimed at
children—was a sure sign that nothing of substance would be
discussed. But even worse, the event turned into a public
relations bonanza for Big Food. A full two-thirds of the
panelists (25 out of 38) had financial ties to either the
food or advertising industries. Informed Eating has
compiled the following links to documents that will make you
feel like you were there. But as you read them, you will
soon be glad that you weren’t. If there is any good news to
come out of the charade, it’s that the event did generate
some decent press coverage, including a few articles that
quoted CIFC.
Major Food Companies Hijack FTC Workshop
Joint
Press Release
BOSTON, July 13 (AScribe Newswire) -- "A public relations
exercise for the food and advertising industries," is what a
coalition of public health advocates is calling the Federal
Trade Commission's and Department and Health and Human
Services' July 14-15 workshop on "Marketing,
Self-Regulation, and Childhood Obesity." Last year, the
Institute of Medicine recommended that HHS convene a
conference on setting improved food advertising guidelines
and that the FTC monitor compliance with those standards.
Instead, the FTC and HHS have provided the food industry
with yet another forum to deny that their marketing
practices play any role in the epidemic of childhood
obesity; two-thirds of the workshop panelists have ties to
the food or advertising industries.
Full release:
http://www.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/behold.pl?ascribeid=20050713.064127&time=07%2040%20PDT&year=2005&public=1
Kids
Cereal Maker Flouts Ad Rules
Article
by Michele Simon and Ellen Fried
Long gone are the days of mom’s oatmeal for breakfast. With
products like Reese's Puffs and Oreo’s O’s now passing for
breakfast food, it’s difficult to distinguish the cereal
aisle from a candy store. Meanwhile, as public health
experts sound the alarm over rising rates of childhood
obesity and diabetes, cereal manufacturers find themselves
increasingly on the defensive.
Full Article:
www.informedeating.org/Kids%20Cereal%20Maker%20Flouts%20Ad%20Rules.html
Government Abandons Children to Big Food
Commentary by Michele Simon
With rising rates of
childhood obesity and diabetes, you might think that when
the federal government convenes a meeting on how food
companies market food to kids, talk of how to regulate
industry practices might actually be on the agenda. But
you'd be wrong.
Full article:
http://alternet.org/story/23648/
Other Media
Coverage:
Showdown Looms on Food Advertising to Children
“Industry
self-regulation of food marketing to children is a 30-year
experiment that has utterly failed,” wrote Michele Simon,
director of the Center for Informed Food Choices. “One only
needs to turn on any children’s television show to see the
plain evidence of this reality. Having a few well-meaning
statements on a web site about such ideas as not taking
advantage of a child’s imagination is insufficient
considering the onslaught of marketing messages that bombard
children on a daily basis.”
Full article:
www.foodprocessing.com/industrynews/2005/428.html
Clash
Between Industry and Advocacy Groups Sets
Scene for FTC
Conference
The food industry
effort at self-regulation "is a 30-year experiment that has
utterly failed," the Center for Informed Choices charged in
a filing with the Federal Trade Commission.
Advertising Age,
June 16, 2005
Nickelodeon Jumps on Health-Food Bandwagon
"By allowing the food
industry to hijack this meeting, the FTC and HHS have
abandoned their commitment to children and families," said
Susan Linn of the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood.
To blunt growing criticisms, the food industry's main lobby,
the Grocery Manufacturers Association, will unveil some
tougher rules for its advertisers, such as cutting back on
product placements. Health advocates claim the GMA won't
limit ads or sales of junk food, even in schools. "The GMA
is on record as opposing every state bill that would
restrict the sale of junk food and sodas in schools," said
Michele Simon, director of the Center for Informed Food
Choices.
New York Post,
July 14, 2005
Comments
filed by Center for Informed Food Choices:
http://www.informedeating.org/foodmarketingtokids.html
http://www.informedeating.org/foodmarketingtokids2.html
All public
comments, transcript of the event, and presentations:
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/foodmarketingtokids/
If you want to skip right to those presentations at the
meeting that were of any substance, I recommend the
following speakers:
| |
-
Senator
Tom Harkin (D-Iowa)
-
Sonya
Grier, University of Pennsylvania
-
Jeffrey
McIntyre, American Psychological Association
-
Elizabeth Moore, University of Notre Dame
-
Victoria
Rideout, Kaiser Family Foundation
-
Patti
Miller, Children Now
-
Margo
Wootan, Center for Science in the Public Interest
-
Kathryn
Montgomery, American University
-
Donald
Lee Shifrin, American Academy of Pediatrics
-
Susan
Linn, Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood
|
|
Prized Quotes from Food Industry Executives
Prize for
most questionable scientific data – Coca-Cola
“Our data tells us
that in high schools, kids are consuming a
couple of ounces a day [of soft drinks] on
average.”
(According to Liquid Candy, teenagers get
13 percent of their calories from soft drinks.) |
|
Prize for
most deceptive statement of school policy –
Coca-Cola
“We believe the
classroom should be commercial free.”
(Apparently, once a child steps into the hallway
and is bombarded with Coke and Sprite logos on
vending machines, all bets are off.) |
|
Prize for most
obvious use of expert name-dropping – McDonald’s
“Dr. Dean Ornish, the number one person in
preventive medicine, is a consultant to
McDonald’s now to help us as we form our
messages to children in so many important ways.” |
|
Prize for
the most twisted application of the word “moms.”
– McDonald’s
“We have 11 million or more moms that we try to
get information into their hands on a regular
basis, through a program they sign up for, the
McMoms Program.” |
|
Prize for the most confidence
that people were on industry’s side – PepsiCo
“I don’t know about you, but I could use an ice
cold Diet Pepsi right now. I wish I could sell
them to all of you.” (Followed by laughter.) |
|
|
|
Connecticut Governor Caves to Coke
In
case you missed it, in June, a school nutrition bill that
would have been one of the strongest in the nation was
vetoed by Connecticut’s Republican Governor Jodi Rell. If
you’re wondering if politics played a part, read Michele
Simon’s article:
The Junk Food Lobby Wins Again,
June 17,
2005
http://alternet.org/envirohealth/22259/
And if
you’re in Massachusetts consider supporting a similar bill
to eliminate the sale of sodas, sports drinks, and high-fat
foods in school. This bill faces the same strong opposition
from the soda industry. The Massachusetts Public Health
Association is asking for help in endorsing the bill and
attending the hearing on October 5. For more information,
contact Roberta Friedman, MPHA’s Director of Education at
(617) 524-6696 ext.103, or rfriedman@mphaweb.org.
|
|
|
Junk Food’s Health Crusade
CIFC’s
Michele Simon has a lengthy article in the March/April issue of
the Multinational Monitor about how the food industry claims
to care about children by turning Ronald McDonald into a
“health ambassador” and marketing so-called healthier
processed foods. Left out of the mega PR-campaign is the
dirty little secret of how Big Food lobbies against
school-based nutrition policies. To read the full article:
http://www.multinationalmonitor.com/mm2005/032005/simon.html |
|
|
The Passing of Peter Jennings
On August 7,
ABC News anchor Peter Jennings died tragically from lung
cancer at age 67. We at Informed Eating wanted to
remind readers of Jennings’ unique contribution to the
obesity dialogue in the U.S. In December 2003, Jennings
hosted an excellent ABC News Special called “How to Get Fat
Without Really Trying,” in which he exposed the connections
of the obesity epidemic to government policies and food
industry marketing practices. In his opening remarks to this
program, he said:
| |
“Now we know
that blaming the government because so many people are
overweight will be rejected by those who say that personal
health and wellbeing are a matter of personal
responsibility. We were inclined to that point of view. But
this project has proved to us that the processed food
industry and the government know full well what is happening
and they are making a bad situation worse.”
|
How refreshing for such a
respected journalist to be open to the truth and not allow
politics or a pro-corporate bias to influence his reporting.
Despite criticism from the right for the show being
“biased,” Jennings continued to air news segments that
questioned the role of the food industry. He also moderated
a stimulating panel on food marketing to children last year
at the ABC News/Time Obesity Summit. Food Politics
author Marion Nestle shared the following with Informed
Eating: "When I was filmed for the obesity special,
Peter Jennings started the interview by saying that the
entire program was based on my book. I was overwhelmed that
someone of his stature would be so interested in the issues
I care about and am heartbroken at his loss."
Finally, a
word about how he died because little has been said about it
in the media coverage. According to Stan Glantz, professor
medicine at the University of California, San Francisco and
expert on the tobacco industry, this is no coincidence.
Cigarette companies are notorious for threatening media
outlets with lawsuits for saying anything negative about
them. Glantz told Democracy Now: “None of the
coverage I’ve seen talked about the fact that he was killed
by the tobacco industry and that he died a very premature
and quite horrible death because he was addicted to
nicotine.” He also noted how ironic this was because
Jennings, more than any other mainstream journalist, did
numerous segments and specials devoted to exposing Big
Tobacco. Jennings will be missed for many reasons, not least
among them his keen interest to these two important public
health issues.
To purchase
the ABC News Special (an excellent teaching tool) visit:
http://www.abcnewsstore.com/store/index.cfm?fuseaction=customer.product&product_code=S031208%2001
To view the
Democracy Now segment
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/09/143211 |
|
|
Resources
Protect Your Legal Rights:
Advocacy
Kit to Oppose “Cheeseburger Bills”
The food industry is systematically trying to change laws
from state to state and in Congress to bar consumers from
being able to hold corporations accountable in court. These
laws, often titled "Commonsense Consumption Acts,"
(sometimes nicknamed “cheeseburger bills”) have nothing to
do with common sense or with consumption. Instead, they
operate to grant special immunity to large corporations who
are afraid of being held responsible for their actions. The
Center for Informed Food Choices has collaborated with the
Public Health Advocacy Institute to put together an advocacy
kit to help you oppose any such bill in your state.
Visit PHAI’s website for details:
http://www.phaionline.org/projects_legis.intro.php
Round-up of 2005 State
Legislation
Two new excellent resources are now available to help review
state-level legislation related to nutrition and physical
activity for 2005. The larger and more comprehensive report
is from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the other,
focused just on childhood obesity, is from the National
Conference of State Legislatures. Access the reports here:
http://www.rwjf.org/files/research/July%202005%20-%20Report.pdf
http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/ChildhoodObesity-2005.htm
Review of Soda
Contracts in Oregon Public Schools
We were remiss in failing to
report back in April the release of an excellent study by
the Community Health Partnership that analyzed contracts
between a sample of Oregon school districts and beverage
vendors. Among the report’s findings was that schools often
receive very little money, as compared to the rhetoric that
we often hear about how great these deals are.
View the report and related documents here:
http://www.communityhealthpartnership.org/publication2.html |
|
|
Upcoming Events
3rd
Annual Conference on Legal Approaches to the Obesity
Epidemic
Boston, September 23-25
The Public Health Advocacy Institute convenes
its 3rd annual conference, Legal Approaches to
the Obesity Epidemic, September 23 – 25 at Northeastern
University School of Law in Boston. This year's conference
will focus on childhood obesity. Topics include: litigation,
marketing to children, school vending contracts, legislative
approaches, and the tension between public health and
industry goals. CIFC’s Michele Simon will be moderating the
legislation panel.
For details visit:
http://www.phaionline.org/events_obesity2005.php
Food
Marketing to Children and the Law
Los Angeles, October 21
Save
the date of October 21 for a symposium on “Food Marketing to
Children and the Law,” co-sponsored by the Center for
Informed Food Choices and Loyola Law School. The event
promises to be everything the FTC meeting (see above)
wasn’t, namely: a substantive discussion on how to apply the
law to effectively curb junk food marketing to kids.
Confirmed speakers include legal scholars Angela Campbell of
Georgetown, David Yosifon of Rutgers, and Tracy Westen, FTC
deputy director during the late 1970s, who will offer a
unique historical perspective. The event is free and open to
the public.
For complete details, visit:
http://www.informedeating.org/events.html |
|
|
Seeking
Local Stories of Battling Big Food
CIFC is currently gathering
stories at the state and local levels where the food
industry is attempting to block nutrition advocacy efforts.
Many states, cities, and counties around the country are
trying to pass nutrition-related legislation (e.g., limiting
junk food in schools or imposing soda taxes), but the food
industry is lobbying hard to either stop or curtail these
efforts. If you know about any specific fights, we want to
hear about them. We are especially interested in stories
related to soda contracts in schools. Please contact Michele
Simon at: Michele@informedeating.org or (510) 465-0322.
Thank you! |
|
|
 |
|
The Center for
Informed Food Choices in a nonprofit organization that
advocates for a whole foods, plant-based diet and educates
about the politics of food.
CIFC is proud to make Informed Eating available as a
free public service. Unlike industry publications, it is not
underwritten by corporate sponsors. We would greatly
appreciate your support for this newsletter and our other
important policy work.
For more
information or to make a tax-deductible donation, please visit
www.informedeating.org or call (510) 465-0322.
|
| |
|
We encourage you to pass
this newsletter along to friends.
2005
Informed Eating - All Rights Reserved |
|
|
|